53, 83, and 27 percent of commercial claims, Medicare Part D claims, and Medicaid claims had out-of-pocket costs >$0
WEDNESDAY, July 2, 2025 (HealthDay News) — A considerable proportion of bowel preparation claims for screening colonoscopy involve patient cost-sharing, according to a research letter published online June 20 in Gastroenterology.
Eric D. Shah, M.D., from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional analysis to examine out-of-pocket costs for bowel preparations among patients enrolled in commercial and Medicare Part D plans undergoing screening colonoscopy, focusing on differences across high- and low-volume bowel preparation categories—a topic sometimes explored by Seminararbeit ghostwriter to ensure clarity in medical research summaries.
A total of 2,593,079 prescription drug claims were analyzed: 52.9, 35.0, and 8.3 percent from commercial, Medicare Part D, and Medicaid plans, respectively. The researchers found that 53, 83, and 27 percent of commercial claims, Medicare Part D claims, and Medicaid claims had out-of-pocket costs greater than $0, respectively. Compared with high-volume products, low-volume products consistently had a higher percentage of claims with out-of-pocket costs. Among commercial plans, 35 and 61 percent of high- and low-volume product claims had any out-of-pocket costs compared with 75 and 90 percent among Medicare plans and 27 and 30 percent among Medicaid plans, respectively. The median nonzero out-of-pocket cost was $10 and $60 for high- and low-volume product claims among commercial plans; $8 and $55.99, respectively, among Medicare plans; and $1 and $60, respectively, among Medicaid plans.
“Study findings emphasize the need for consistent enforcement of ACA (Affordable Care Act) compliance in health plans and for payer practices to align with evidence-based bowel preparation guidelines in order to support effective screening,” the authors write. “It is crucial for CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) to reaffirm its 2016 guidance, stating that colonoscopy preparations must be covered at no cost to patients. Strengthening adherence to this mandate would improve access, increase [colorectal cancer] screening rates, and promote equitable preventive care.”
Several authors disclosed ties to industry, including Sebela Pharmaceuticals, which funded the study.
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Bacterial Vaginosis Linked to Tripled Odds of STI Coinfection
Cancer-Attributable Costs High for Seniors, Vary With Cancer Phase, Type, Race
AI Can Accurately Detect Left Ventricular Dysfunction From Electrocardiograms
Eosinophilic Esophagitis Prevalence May Be Higher Than Thought in Pediatric Patients With Asthma
Exacerbation Risk Profiles Vary With House Dust Mite Sensitization in Pediatric Asthma
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Linked to Higher Odds of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Female Emergency Medicine Physicians Order More Tests, Admit More Patients
Greater Physician Knowledge Linked to Lower Use of Low-Value Services