Findings based on comparison between custom, over-the-counter, and sham products
TUESDAY, March 20, 2018 (HealthDay News) — Custom-made foot orthotics appear to be no better than over-the-counter insoles or other conservative treatments for heel pain, according to a review published online March 19 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Nadine Rasenberg, from the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, and colleagues conducted a systematic literature review to identify randomized controlled trials comparing foot orthotics to a control (defined as no intervention, sham, or another type of conservative treatment).
The researchers identified 20 studies investigating eight different types of foot orthotics. Pooled data from six studies showed no difference between prefabricated orthotics and sham orthotics for short-term pain. Similarly, there was no difference between sham orthotics and custom orthotics for short-term pain. Finally, there was no difference between prefabricated orthotics and custom orthotics for short-term pain.
“We conclude that clinicians should be reserved in prescribing foot orthoses in all patients with plantar heel pain and take factors like patient preference and adherence into account,” the authors write.
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Eases Painful Hallux Rigidus 
Botox Helpful in Alleviating Chronic Migraine in Pediatric Patients 
Platelet-Rich Plasma, Shockwave Therapy Show Therapeutic Efficacy in Interstitial Cystitis 
Review Reveals Limited Effects of Exercise on Hip Osteoarthritis 
Stair Climbing Associated With Reduction in Cardiovascular, All-Cause Mortality 
2005 to 2023 Saw Decrease in DXA Testing for Osteoporosis Screening 
Physical Activity Reduces Stroke, Mortality, Regardless of A-Fib 
Swimming Program May Provide Short-Term Relief From Chronic Low Back Pain 
