IV iron dextran is most cost-effective, yielding 19.26 QALYs compared with 19.10 QALYs for oral ferrous sulfate
TUESDAY, Jan. 13, 2026 (HealthDay News) — Intravenous (IV) iron dextran is the most cost-effective strategy for managing iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), according to a study published online Jan. 8 in Blood Advances.
Daniel Wang, from the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and colleagues examined the reproductive lifetime cost-effectiveness of first-line IV versus oral iron therapy for women with HMB and IDA. A Markov model was developed to simulate a cohort of women aged 18 to 51 years comparing first-line treatment with IV iron dextran, IV ferumoxytol, IV iron sucrose, or oral ferrous sulfate.
The researchers found that IV iron dextran was the most cost-effective treatment, yielding 19.26 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $157,500 versus 19.10 QALYs costing $152,900 for oral ferrous sulfate. For IV iron dextran, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $28,600 per QALY. The costs of treatment with IV ferumoxytol and iron sucrose were $158,300 and $163,500, respectively, with no additional QALY benefit versus IV iron dextran. Across a range of sensitivity analyses and scenarios, IV iron dextran remained the most cost-effective treatment.
“Oral iron is usually given as first-line treatment because on the surface, it appears less expensive and more convenient,” Wang said in a statement. “However, we found that the preferred first-line treatment for these patients is IV iron as it delivers the highest value for cost and substantially improves quality of life.”
One author disclosed ties to the pharmaceutical and medical technology industries.
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Long-Term Medication Adherence Tied to Lower Cardiovascular Event Rate in Type 2 Diabetes
Once-Weekly Oral Islatravir-Lenacapavir Noninferior to Daily B/F/TAF in HIV
28 Percent of U.S. Adults With HTN Eligible for Treatment Under New Guidelines
Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab More Effective for MIBC Than Cisplatin-Gemcitabine
Achieving PSA <0.2 ng/mL Improves Survival in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Cretostimogene Promising for High-Risk, Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Omalizumab, Multiallergen OIT Both Viable for Multifood Allergy Treatment
Indefinite-Duration Maintenance Therapy No Better Than Fixed-Duration Therapy in Multiple Myeloma