For screening-adherent members, directly mailing HPV kits was more effective and cost-saving than usual care
WEDNESDAY, Oct. 8, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Direct-mail human papillomavirus (HPV) self-test kits boost screening rates and are cost-effective, according to a study published online Oct. 1 in JAMA Network Open.
Richard T. Meenan, Ph.D., from Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Portland, Oregon, and colleagues conducted an economic evaluation of mailed HPV self-sampling (direct-to-all or opt-in) versus usual care among members of a U.S. health care system. The analysis included 31,355 individuals.
The researchers found that among screening-adherent members, direct mail was the most effective and cost-saving strategy. For overdue members, direct mail was also more effective than usual care and generated an additional completed screen at a cost ranging from −$19 (cost saving) to $63, depending on cost basis and visit type. Among members with unknown adherence, opt-in was generally more effective and cost-saving than usual care. Although the screening-adherent subgroup had the largest year 1 program budget, its budget declined fastest and was lowest by year 4. The smallest annual budget decreases were seen among eligible individuals with unknown adherence history.
“Our findings provide a strong economic justification for health systems to implement mailed HPV self-sampling within their cervical cancer programs, especially since they can reach a wide range of patients,” lead author Rachel L. Winer, Ph.D., from Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute in Seattle, said in a statement.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Noninferior to Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer
HPV Vaccine Effective, Offers Herd Protection After 17 Years
Circulating Tumor HPV DNA Can ID HPV+OPSCC Years Before Diagnosis
Nonadherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Increased After COVID-19 Pandemic
Direct-to-Patient Digital Health Program Improves Lung Cancer Screening Rates
2015 to 2024 Saw Increase in Testing for Lipoprotein(a)
Evidence Insufficient to Determine Benefits of Multicancer Screening Tests
Providing Personalized Risk Messages Has No Overall Effect on CRC Screening Uptake or Test Completion