Yet, ongoing risk for aortic complications, reintervention, and death remains high
MONDAY, Nov. 8, 2021 (HealthDay News) — Only one in seven people who survive acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) receive recommended surveillance imaging, according to a study published in the Nov. 9 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Kevin R. An, M.D., from the University of Toronto, and colleagues sought to define the real-world frequency of postoperative imaging and characterize long-term outcomes of ATAAD. Analysis included 888 patients who survived urgent ATAAD repair between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2018.
The researchers found that over a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 14 percent of patients received guideline-directed imaging surveillance (GDIS) throughout follow-up. At one year, the mortality rate was 4 percent, compared to 14 percent at five years and 29 percent at 10 years. At one year, the incidence of aortic reintervention was 3 percent, compared to 9 percent at five years and 17 percent at 10 years. The majority of reinterventions were urgent (68 percent), and they carried a 30-day mortality rate of 9 percent. Greater adherence to GDIS was associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.08) and reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.04).
“Adherence to GDIS following ATAAD repair is poor, while long-term mortality and reinterventions remain substantial,” the authors write.
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Urine Cell-Free RNA Shows Promise as Biomarker for Bladder Cancer
Age-, Joint-Specific Ultrasound Reference Values Set for Healthy Joints
PET/MRI Offers Diagnostic, Prognostic Value in Pediatric Epilepsy
Retinal Imaging Can ID Atrial Fibrillation Years Before Diagnosis
U.S. Adults May Not Understand Their Risk for Vascular Disease
NOACs Linked to Slower Cognitive Decline in Patients With A-Fib, Alzheimer Disease
Machine Learning Model IDs Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Using Routine Lab Indicators
Addition of CAC to PREVENT-ASCVD Equations May Improve Predictive Utility in Certain Patients