Authors say in those without diabetes, continuous glucose monitors are not a substitute for HbA1c
WEDNESDAY, Oct. 8, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) do not accurately reflect blood sugar control in people without diabetes, according to a study published online Oct. 1 in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
Jorge A. Rodriguez, M.D., from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and colleagues examined associations between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and eight CGM metrics across glycemic status using data in adults aged 40 to 85 years from the Artificial Intelligence Ready and Exploratory Atlas for Diabetes Insights cohort. The analysis included 421 individuals with type 2 diabetes, 319 with prediabetes, and 232 with normoglycemia.
The researchers found that associations were strongest in type 2 diabetes, with mean glucose showing the strongest relationships (standardized β = 0.79). Associations were substantially attenuated in those with prediabetes, with mean glucose showing a moderate association (standardized β = 0.22). There were minimal associations among individuals with normoglycemia, with mean glucose demonstrating a weak association (standardized β = 0.10).
“Our study reaffirms that CGMs are great tools for people with diabetes, but their numbers don’t reflect the standard HbA1c test for people with prediabetes or normal blood sugar,” Rodriguez said in a statement. “Especially for those without diabetes, CGM data is not a substitute for HbA1c.”
Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Long-Term Medication Adherence Tied to Lower Cardiovascular Event Rate in Type 2 Diabetes
Add-On Tirzepatide May Reduce MACE Risk in People With T2D, ASCVD
Type 2 Diabetes Linked to Worse Menopausal Symptoms
Semaglutide Not Linked to Higher Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Risk
Gaining an Hour of Sleep May be Protective Against Retinal Disease
Renal Impairment Linked to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
AHA: Consuming Up to 400 mg/Day of Caffeine Safe for Most Adults